Quinn Makes Idle Threats to Close Facilities

Gov. Pat Quinn has threatened in a press conference to close seven Illinois state  facilities, including two prisons and centers for the mentally ill and developmentally  disabled. The facilities won’t ultimately be closed because there is no place for the  wrongdoers, ill and infirm to go. 

Yet these people have become pawns in a budget controversy that pits Quinn  against the legislature, doctors and hospitals, state employee unions and probably the  federal courts. 

There has to be a better way to resolve conflict than governing by press  conference. 

The background is this. Prior to the 2010 elections, which he won very narrowly,  Gov. Quinn inked a pact with pleased state employee unions that promised no layoffs if  he were elected. This was to go along with contractual pay increases negotiated earlier to  go in effect in 2011. 

This spring the Illinois House, with support from both Democrats and  Republicans, crafted a budget that severely cut several state agencies on the premise that  lawmakers would budget no more dollars than the revenues projected to come in during  the year.  

The budget provided much less than Quinn had requested and induced him to  spurn the pay increases and no layoff pledge and then to threaten the facility closures. 

Quinn also imposed reduction vetoes in the budget bill that would reduce  spending for medical care by about $300 million. “Accept my reductions and I won’t  close the facilities,” says Quinn. 

But the reductions would come from payments to hospitals and doctors, who  claim they are already woefully underpaid for their services. And they have strong  support in the legislature, especially from Republican lawmakers who were otherwise  pleased with the overall budget cutting. 

Budgeting is about the politics of who gets what. And nobody wants less.  Further, state government budgeting is largely about providing services to people— school kids, college students, foster children, the ill, infirm, prisoners. I figure that about  5-6 million of the state’s 12-plus million residents receive state services of one kind or  another and often more than one service per person.  

In the past decade the legislature and governor simply budgeted what they felt  needed to be spent, without worrying about how much was coming in via taxes. As a  result, Illinois overspent by about $3 billion a year and went deep into debt. 

So the income tax was increased to cover the annual over-spending and maybe  start to whittle down the backlog of bills. Even with the new tax money, the budget is  tight. 

Yet few lawmakers and citizens are willing to throw disabled children and adults  onto the streets, and prisons are already significantly overcrowded. Shoe-horning more  inmates into fewer prisons would probably invite a federal lawsuit that would claim  inmates are being denied basic human rights. A recent federal court decision in California  is, for example, forcing that state to find more room for its prisoners. 

Some day the state institutions for the developmentally disabled may be closed,  with the residents transferred to community-based facilities, but I don’t think the  communities are ready for the residents just yet. 

The likely result of the present contretemps between governor and lawmakers and  interest groups will be adjustments in the budget to allow the threatened institutions to  continue operating, but without funding for pay increases to state employees. The  employee unions will fight out that contractual issue in court. 

A better approach than government by press conference would be for the  governor and legislative leaders to sit down and hash out the actual problems between a  legislative budget that may have been too austere for certain agencies and a governor who  was overly generous in his commitments before the election.

Previous
Previous

State Budget

Next
Next

Small Town America and Budgets