Sun Setting on Rural Illinois?

I gave a talk this past week about the future of rural Illinois to a gathering of presidents of  Illinois community foundations.  

Never above getting a twofer out of a talk, I penned this column. I write because I believe rural  communities have contributed much to the development of America and of Americans. 

I think presidents from Eisenhower to Reagan and Carter reached the pinnacle of public life in  good part because they learned in their small towns that we’re all in this together, and that  working together makes sense. 

[After decades away, I moved back a few years ago to my rural hometown of Toulon in central  Illinois (pop. 1,300, if you include the nursing home, in Stark County, pop. 5,900). I found more  vitality than I expected, as parents and grandparents rally round the schools and their young’uns.] 

Yet the population and economic decline of rural Illinois has been relentless over the decades.  For example, in 1890 my farmland county of Stark had twice as many people as today! 

As middle-class jobs have flown (actually many of them were in factories in nearby cities, where  small town workers often car-pooled to their jobs), a white underclass has been developing.  

Low-income residents from cities come to the low rents of unoccupied farm houses and shabby  frame homes in town.  

In response, some towns build modern low-income housing, which actually increases the  numbers of low-income residents; those in the shabby frame homes move into the modern  housing, and more low-income folks come out to fill the shabby homes. 

Wealth transfer is another big problem for small towns. As farmland owners pass on, they are  more likely today to leave their significant wealth in land to descendants who now live in Florida  or California, rather to the son who would stay on to run the farm.  

Small towns are not created equal. I have a theory of concentric rings around cities of, say,  100,000 people or so. Towns within the near-in ring 5-10 miles from city center will likely  become suburbs, as folks who can move away from struggling schools and urban problems. 

Small towns 10-30 miles from city center will be most at risk. They are close enough for  shopping at the Big Box stores, causing many small town Main Streets to shrivel up, as many  have. 

Communities 30 and more miles out from cities will survive as market towns, just far enough  away from the Big Box competition. Their service areas will continue to decline in population,  but the towns will continue. 

I have quipped that 19 out of 20 towns under about 2,000 population will probably become  grease spots along the road in the coming two-three decades—but that 19 of 20 of those towns  believe they will be that 20th town to make it. This is good, as it means these towns and their  leaders will at least slow the often almost inevitable decline. 

The towns more likely to survive are those with “a view,” those at the intersections of interstate  highways, and those with strong, creative leadership. 

An easy-on-the-eye town like Galena, near the Mississippi in northwestern Illinois, has become a  model for wannabe destination towns that seek to serve the growing class of day-trippers and  weekenders.  

Galena and its scenic Jo Daviess County (pop. 3,000+ and 22,000, respectively) provide 1,600  jobs via tourism, more than the second biggest employer group, that of government-education health care, with 990. 

Great leadership is another key. Effingham has the Schultz Family and others like it. Town  leaders in the city of 12,000+ developed CEO (Creating Economic Opportunity), an exciting  business entrepreneurship program for high-schoolers.  

Students meet before school at businesses to learn about how to become entrepreneurs; many do.  The program is being replicated in towns across the Midwest. 

It helps, of course, that Effingham is at the crossroads of two interstates, in the heart of America. 

Towns most at risk are small towns under 2,000 located on fertile yet table-top flat, boring (to  some) farmland, where declining school enrollments threaten the viability of the hometown  school, the raison d’etre of the town. 

My friends at community foundations propose that prosperous folks—farmland owners, for  example—contribute a slice of their legacy to groups like theirs. In this way, they could plow  something back into the small towns so dear to them, and just maybe help keep them alive. 

Some small towns are worth saving. We should rally round efforts to do so.